<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike Verdusco &#187; Comcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mike.verdusco.com/tag/comcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mike.verdusco.com</link>
	<description>The View From My Angle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality: Why no public concern? &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/09/06/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/09/06/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike.verdusco.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Industry pull the plug on open Internet access? Many other stakeholders would like to have regulations enacted on Internet traffic. The entertainment companies that produce media content are interested in protecting their works. There are several stories that have covered the trading of video and music content. The media companies want to protect their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/09/06/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality: Why no public concern? &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/08/28/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/08/28/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike.verdusco.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Network Neutrality is a complicated issue with many stakeholders and angles of concern. A majority of the United States population has some form of Internet access and currently this access is generally not filtered for content that the consumer is requesting. Filtering the content of the data being transmitted between consumer and network resource is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/08/28/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
