<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike Verdusco &#187; Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mike.verdusco.com/tag/net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mike.verdusco.com</link>
	<description>The View From My Angle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Open Internet&#8230; if you have a wire</title>
		<link>http://mike.verdusco.com/2010/08/10/the-open-internet-if-you-have-a-wire/</link>
		<comments>http://mike.verdusco.com/2010/08/10/the-open-internet-if-you-have-a-wire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike.verdusco.com/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Google and Verizon announced a shared Internet policy, in an attempt to define Net Neutrality. This seems to be a fist step for the two to change the debate of Net Neutrality form &#8220;open access to the Internet&#8221; to &#8220;open access if you have a wired connection.&#8221; What is missing is that while they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mike.verdusco.com/2010/08/10/the-open-internet-if-you-have-a-wire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Open Internet</title>
		<link>http://mike.verdusco.com/2010/08/05/the-open-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://mike.verdusco.com/2010/08/05/the-open-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike.verdusco.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a big buzz over the alleged talks between Google and Verizon. I will have to admit that I was quite nervous as Google has become one of the largest holders of personal data and if they decide that profit is the only motivator it could get messy. The NY Times original broke the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mike.verdusco.com/2010/08/05/the-open-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality: Why no public concern? &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/09/06/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/09/06/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike.verdusco.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Industry pull the plug on open Internet access? Many other stakeholders would like to have regulations enacted on Internet traffic. The entertainment companies that produce media content are interested in protecting their works. There are several stories that have covered the trading of video and music content. The media companies want to protect their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/09/06/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality: Why no public concern? &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/08/28/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/08/28/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike.verdusco.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Network Neutrality is a complicated issue with many stakeholders and angles of concern. A majority of the United States population has some form of Internet access and currently this access is generally not filtered for content that the consumer is requesting. Filtering the content of the data being transmitted between consumer and network resource is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mike.verdusco.com/2008/08/28/net-neutrality-why-no-public-concern-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

