Yesterday, Google and Verizon announced a shared Internet policy, in an attempt to define Net Neutrality. This seems to be a fist step for the two to change the debate of Net Neutrality form “open access to the Internet” to “open access if you have a wired connection.” What is missing is that while they have stated in their policy that wireless broadband is different this is a bit of a smoke screen. It is true that this uses wireless spectrum that is a finite resources but this is used for the last leg of the journey. If I request a webpage on my phone, it does not magically radiate through the air to my phone for the whole journey. It is delivered from the web server where it is hosted and travels the Internet backbone to my phone companies wired network. Until finally, it launches into the air from the nearest cell tower, likely by way of a satellite first, to my phone. It is the last leg of the journey that is wireless after it traverses the wired Internet. So, by extension they are seeking to regulate wired traffic, even if by proxy so to speak.
The type of actions that are implied by this policy indicate “evil” to put it in Google terms. Google has a motto of “do no evil” but in this case they are precisely targeting the dark side. Verizon and other communication companies have tried to tread these waters before and it has not set well with the public. When this policy was announced it was under the guise of moving the debate forward. I think that they are searching for the correct words to guide the public down the slippery slope, that side steps the principles of Net Neutrality. I hope and encourage the public become involved in the debate because we cannot leave this in the hands of the corporate interests.